🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are monitoring intently to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

European Movement

Across Europe, a growing group of nations are considering comparable bans.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and networks are "taking away our kids' innocence". A law could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to enact a law increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a related step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended parents to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without a parent decides otherwise is given. While it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a solid starting point," commented a leading parliamentarian behind the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Earlier, interest grew behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have expressed warnings. An organization set up by the relatives of a young person who died after being exposed to dangerous online content contends that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to create tools that are secure and fit for minors," commented a leading peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, action is mostly happening at the local level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a law barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has approved a law capping minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional access needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed bills demanding parental consent for minors to set up social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from certain figures to copy this lead, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Views

Beyond these regions, other states are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, world organizations adopt a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even backfire". The body highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

While this international debate continues, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries show that policymakers internationally are no longer prepared to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.